Legal risk / Jun 25, 2026 / 5 min
Nearly 400 Newspapers Filed a Coordinated Suit Against OpenAI
On June 24, nearly 400 local and regional newspapers filed the largest coordinated copyright suit yet against OpenAI and Microsoft — weeks after OpenAI's confidential IPO registration forces Wall Street to price whether training data was ever free.
On June 24, nearly 400 local newspapers sued OpenAI and Microsoft for scraping paywalled reporting to train ChatGPT and Copilot — the largest coordinated copyright action by community publishers yet, filed weeks after OpenAI's confidential IPO registration and armed with Sam Altman's own admission that frontier models cannot be built without copyrighted work.
What happened:
- On June 24, 2026, a coalition of 38 publisher plaintiffs filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York — case 1:26-cv-05320, Richner Communications, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation.
- Together they operate nearly 400 local and regional outlets across 33 states, from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette and WEHCO Newspapers to The New York Amsterdam News and Community Impact Newspaper.
- Platkin LLP — the firm founded by former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin — represents the publishers.
The allegations:
- The complaint accuses OpenAI and Microsoft of "systematically and secretly" crawling publisher sites — including content behind paywalls — copying hundreds of thousands of articles, and using them to train large language models.
- Plaintiffs say defendants stripped copyright management information — bylines, copyright notices, terms of use — in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
- They seek statutory damages and injunctive relief for copyright infringement and DMCA violations.
- The filing calls the conduct "willful" and ongoing: models must be continuously retrained, so the alleged theft repeats.
The quote that cuts:
- The complaint cites Sam Altman's own words: in a House of Lords submission, OpenAI conceded it would be "impossible to train today's leading AI models without using copyrighted materials."
- Plaintiffs argue OpenAI made deliberate engineering choices to obscure the origins of what it copied — even as other publisher suits advanced.
The money at stake:
- The complaint says OpenAI now generates roughly $2 billion in monthly revenue and was last valued at $852 billion.
- It alleges OpenAI confidentially filed with the SEC for an IPO in June 2026 that could rank among the largest public offerings ever.
- Microsoft, a co-defendant, has invested at least $13 billion in OpenAI and deployed Copilot across its product stack.
- Plaintiffs claim those products generated "hundreds of billions of dollars" in market value while paying publishers "not a cent."
What OpenAI says:
- Spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg Law: "Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use."
- Microsoft did not immediately respond to a request for comment, per Bloomberg Law.
Why this suit is different:
- The New York Times, Daily News, authors, and encyclopedia publishers have already sued — but this is the largest coordinated action by local and regional newspapers.
- Matthew Platkin told Bloomberg Law prior national suits "haven't yet brought local news outlets to the table" — and warned a settlement that only benefits national players would be "inequitable."
- He called local news "the lifeblood of our democracy" and said the AI business model has put it "at risk of extinction."
- The case joins a growing MDL docket in the same courthouse where NYT v. OpenAI is fighting over 20 million ChatGPT conversation logs — discovery plaintiffs say could prove market substitution.
The IPO angle:
- Public markets demand bounded legal risk. OpenAI's confidential filing landed the same month this complaint arrived.
- Every unresolved copyright case becomes a line item on the eventual S-1 — and statutory damages scale per work, not per company.
- Anthropic just paid $1.5 billion to settle an authors' class action. OpenAI is betting fair use wins in court instead. 400 hometown papers just raised the price of being wrong.
Convina's view: Silicon Valley spent a decade treating journalism as free training fuel and called it innovation. This lawsuit is the bill arriving at the worst possible moment — right as OpenAI asks public shareholders to price a trillion-dollar bet on data it never licensed. Fair use may still win in court. But the coalition now spans national mastheads, encyclopedias, music labels, and the reporters who cover your school board. IPO roadshows don't survive "impossible to build without copyrighted materials" on page one of the prospectus risk factors. OpenAI will settle, license, or discount — and local news finally has a seat at that table.